<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Da Vinci Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rahulsarin.com/journal/the-da-vinci-code-131/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rahulsarin.com/journal/the-da-vinci-code-131/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-da-vinci-code</link>
	<description>I've started my journey but I don't know my destination.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: niharika</title>
		<link>http://rahulsarin.com/journal/the-da-vinci-code-131/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>niharika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rahulsarin.com/2006/06/02/the-da-vinci-code/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>oh, and paul bettany was amazing!!! really good acting. n yes, tom hanks looked really silly. he seemed very weak and old in the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and paul bettany was amazing!!! really good acting. n yes, tom hanks looked really silly. he seemed very weak and old in the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niharika</title>
		<link>http://rahulsarin.com/journal/the-da-vinci-code-131/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>niharika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rahulsarin.com/2006/06/02/the-da-vinci-code/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>yes, u do understand the movie even if you don&#039;t read the book, but the movie is just a shadow of the book. after reading the book, you&#039;ll understand so much more. minor details. with the movie you just get a hacked up edited picture. but no depth. i say, see the movie, then read the book. the movie&#039;s not a patch on the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, u do understand the movie even if you don&#8217;t read the book, but the movie is just a shadow of the book. after reading the book, you&#8217;ll understand so much more. minor details. with the movie you just get a hacked up edited picture. but no depth. i say, see the movie, then read the book. the movie&#8217;s not a patch on the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone out there</title>
		<link>http://rahulsarin.com/journal/the-da-vinci-code-131/comment-page-1/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>someone out there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rahulsarin.com/2006/06/02/the-da-vinci-code/#comment-819</guid>
		<description>yeah the movie is quite good...and you wont many ppl who didnt like the book...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah the movie is quite good&#8230;and you wont many ppl who didnt like the book&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

